IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Mobile Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    21

    Default IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I was setting up a Palm III for a friend of mine, and was trying to IR beam some stuff from my TX to her III, and it failed. I'm wondering if there's a basic incompatibility between the older IR and the newer IR, or if the IR port on her III might be bad.

    The III does not have any weird stuff on it, just what came with it and HandyShopper. The TX IR has worked between it and another TX and a T3, so I doubt the TX IR is not working.

    Ideas? I did a search, which led me to threads which apparently are no longer available.

    Tracy

  2. #2
    Brain stuck BogoMipping
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Guayaquil, Ecuador
    Posts
    6,984

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I've seen similar problems when trying to beam between an old and a new model, say between an m515 and a Tungsten T5. There does seem to be an incompatibility, perhaps a timing error?

    If you want to be sure the III's IR port is working fine, aim any digital camera (even a cellphone camera) at the port, then initiate beaming of anything on the III. The viewer on the camera should show the IR port blinking as it tries to establish communication.

    Just to make sure, you do have the IR port on the III active? Check in Prefs -> Power -> Set Beam Receive to On.
    raspabalsa
    Vx -> m515 -> T1 -> T2 -> T3 -> TX w/ 4500 mAH battery, glass digitizer and Toppoly screen -> Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0 + Apple BlueTooth Keyboard
    Samsung Galaxy Mini CM 7.1

    There are just four simple machines to alter force: the lever, the pulley, the inclined plane and, um, the internal combustion engine - Calvin
    Anything with a large enough engine will fly

  3. #3
    Life is a circus!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    12,425

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I believe the IR port on the III is stronger than the TX. The IR in the TX is a bit finicky, in my experience.

    When you say the send failed, what happened? Did it just time out, or was there some other error?
    This Signature Line Intentionally Left Blank

  4. #4
    Mobile Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    21

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    Quote Originally Posted by raspabalsa View Post
    I've seen similar problems when trying to beam between an old and a new model, say between an m515 and a Tungsten T5. There does seem to be an incompatibility, perhaps a timing error?

    If you want to be sure the III's IR port is working fine, aim any digital camera (even a cellphone camera) at the port, then initiate beaming of anything on the III. The viewer on the camera should show the IR port blinking as it tries to establish communication.

    Just to make sure, you do have the IR port on the III active? Check in Prefs -> Power -> Set Beam Receive to On.
    Quote Originally Posted by jigwashere View Post
    I believe the IR port on the III is stronger than the TX. The IR in the TX is a bit finicky, in my experience.

    When you say the send failed, what happened? Did it just time out, or was there some other error?
    Ok, beam receive was on, and though I didn't try to send from the III to the TX, I will check the IR send from the III this weekend, using a camera.

    When it failed, the III said it couldn't find something to receive (can't remember exact wording) and the TX said it "Could not find a receiving device."

    I had them about an inch apart. Perhaps holding them further apart would work better? I have a couple more IIIs at home that I can experiment with between now and Sunday.

    Thanks, guys.

  5. #5
    Life is a circus!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    12,425

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I have a IIIxe and as I recall was able to send/receive from my TX. Let us know the results of your testing!
    This Signature Line Intentionally Left Blank

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    6,428

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I had a little quirk when I used IR to transfer some files from my Vx to my LifeDrive (a similar but smaller jump than the one you describe). It worked almost perfectly until I got near the end and it stopped working. (In fact, I think I posted here on BH about it). I think someone suggested (or I tried it myself, I don't recall); but I did a soft reset of my Lifedrive (I think I was getting a 'no device detected' error) and everything worked again. You may want to soft-reset both devices before proceeding.

  7. #7
    Life is a circus!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    12,425

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    thock, what are you beaming from the TX? Are you using the built-in beam function? You might have more luck using FileZ. You can find a link to it in the first post here: Best Free TX Apps
    This Signature Line Intentionally Left Blank

  8. #8
    Mobile Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    Dont know about the T|X, but my m500 and my IIIx get along just fine. I think you are right about the III's being "stronger", as I get a much greater range with NoviiRemote etc... under it.

  9. #9
    hal
    hal is offline
    itchy and cold feet hal
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,231

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    thock, welcome to Brighthand!

    For one, even if both devices are properly pairing using IrDA, there are contents that one may understand and the other may not. For second, there used to be a compatibility mismatch in several conditions when using a newer Palm device, IIRC from the very beginning of Palm OS v.5 (now called Garnet). Palm published a RAW update for the IrDA.
    "Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda. "Nothing is neither wear-proof, nor fail-proof, least fool-proof." - HAL. "Indeed, fool-proof inventions have been attempted, but don't work, fools are pretty witty ones." - Murphy's Law. "Even worse than a traitor, is a dumb@$$ with initiative." - Gral. Santa Ana
    Link: Palm resets

  10. #10
    Mobile Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: IR compatibility with newer Palm OS models

    I think maybe you may need OS 4 on your III in order to work with newer devices, as thats what I needed to get IR hotsync working.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. LCD compatibility between 700wx and other models
    By SmartyPhone in forum Treo 700w and 700wx
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-16-2010, 02:31 PM
  2. Newer models less bright?
    By rhubarb in forum Palm TX
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2005, 01:59 PM
  3. 4150 vs newer models?
    By glaggle in forum iPAQ h4000 series
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-04-2004, 11:21 PM
  4. are any of the newer models upgradeable? -m-
    By RickAgresta in forum General Palm OS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-18-2004, 01:31 PM
  5. Blueish tint on newer models
    By Jimmy C in forum Jornada 560 series
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-27-2002, 03:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0